What action must be taken if you encounter a conflicting signal situation?

When encountering a conflicting signal situation, the appropriate course of action is to abide by the more restrictive indication. This approach is essential for ensuring safety and maintaining the proper protocol in train operations.

In railway operations, conflicting signals can create ambiguous situations where it may not be clear which signal to follow. By adhering to the more restrictive indication, which typically might indicate a slower speed or stopping requirement, train crews prioritize safety above all else, minimizing the risk of accidents or operational disruptions.

This action also aligns with the principle that in ambiguous situations, erring on the side of caution is critical. It reflects the understanding that more restrictive signals are designed to prevent potential hazards.

Other options may involve choosing between the cab signal or the fixed signal, but they do not explicitly account for the conflicting nature of the situation. Clearing the situation with a dispatcher could be necessary, but it does not address the immediate need for action in the presence of conflicting signals. Abiding by the more restrictive indication provides the best immediate response to ensure safe train operations.